{"id":954,"date":"2026-07-15T09:42:00","date_gmt":"2026-07-15T09:42:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jnrfid.com\/?p=954"},"modified":"2026-07-15T09:42:00","modified_gmt":"2026-07-15T09:42:00","slug":"minimum-spacing-between-uhf-rfid-tags-to-avoid-interference","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jnrfid.com\/fr\/minimum-spacing-between-uhf-rfid-tags-to-avoid-interference\/","title":{"rendered":"Espace minimum entre les \u00e9tiquettes RFID UHF \u2014 Guide d'interf\u00e9rence et de d\u00e9calage"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Planning <strong>minimum spacing between uhf rfid tags to avoid interference<\/strong> starts with RF physics\u2014not reader software alone. Before you lock a layout, confirm these spacing checkpoints against your substrate and <strong>overlapping read zones<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>0.5-inch red line:<\/strong> Below ~12.7&nbsp;mm, near-field <strong>mutual coupling<\/strong> detunes tags out of the <strong>860&ndash;960 MHz frequency band<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Collision vs detuning:<\/strong> An <strong>anti-collision algorithm<\/strong> fixes timing clashes\u2014it cannot wake a detuned tag.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Application gap:<\/strong> Retail inlays often need 1.0&ndash;1.5&nbsp;in; cartons 2.0&ndash;3.0&nbsp;in; metal assets 3.0+&nbsp;in with specialized tags.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Tag placement:<\/strong> 90&deg; or 45&deg; orientation offsets cut <strong>electromagnetic coupling<\/strong> when linear spacing is tight.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Later sections map industry spacing tables, reader polarization choices, and OEM inlay tuning when standard gaps are impossible.<\/p>\n<h2>Minimum Spacing Between UHF RFID Tags: Physics &amp; Mutual Coupling<\/h2>\n<p>When designing high-density tracking systems, the physical laws governing radio frequency (RF) energy dictate how close tags can sit next to one another. Systems often fail not because of cheap hardware, but because basic electromagnetic limits were pushed too far.<\/p>\n<h3>Mutual Coupling: How Close Tags Act Like Detuned Transformers<\/h3>\n<p>When passive RFID tags are placed in tight proximity, their antennas experience <strong>mutual coupling<\/strong>. In simple terms, they begin to behave like a single, poorly wound transformer rather than independent transponders. <\/p>\n<p>The electromagnetic fields of adjacent antennas bleed into each other, causing a severe <strong>detuning effect<\/strong>. This shift pulls the tag&#8217;s resonant frequency away from the tuned 860\u2013960 MHz frequency band<sup><a href=\"#ref-2\" class=\"cite-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 2: ISO\/IEC 18000-63\">[2]<\/a><\/sup>. Because the tag is no longer resonant, it cannot harvest enough RF energy from the RFID reader antenna, resulting in immediate read range degradation and signal attenuation.<\/p>\n<h3>The Near-Field Boundary: A 0.5-Inch Electromagnetic Threshold<\/h3>\n<p>The transition zone between near-field vs. far-field behavior is where most spacing failures occur. For standard passive UHF RFID tags, <strong>0.5 inches (12.7 mm)<\/strong> represents the critical boundary restriction.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Below 0.5 inches:<\/strong> Strong reactive near-field electromagnetic coupling dominates, causing massive impedance mismatches.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Above 0.5 inches:<\/strong> Far-field radiation begins to take over. While interference still exists, the severe detuning effects drop off rapidly.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>For reliable operations, we advise engineers to treat 0.5 inches not as a safe operating distance, but as the absolute red line where physical hardware performance collapses.<\/p>\n<h3>Tag Collision vs. Antenna Detuning: Why Software Can\u2019t Fix Invisibility<\/h3>\n<p>A common engineering mistake is assuming a reader\u2019s anti-collision protocol will resolve close-proximity reading issues. It is vital to separate these two distinct problems:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Tag-to-tag collision:<\/strong> This is a software and protocol issue. It occurs when multiple active tags reply to the reader simultaneously. The reader&#8217;s <strong>anti-collision algorithm<\/strong> easily manages this<sup><a href=\"#ref-3\" class=\"cite-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 3: PMC tag-to-tag interference\">[3]<\/a><\/sup> by instructing tags to back off and transmit at different millisecond intervals.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Antenna detuning:<\/strong> This is a physical hardware failure. If tags are placed below the recommended minimum spacing, mutual coupling prevents the tag&#8217;s integrated circuit (IC) from ever waking up. <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If a tag is physically detuned, it remains electrically dead. No software or anti-collision algorithm<sup><a href=\"#ref-3\" class=\"cite-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 3: PMC tag-to-tag interference\">[3]<\/a><\/sup> can communicate with a tag that cannot harvest enough energy to power itself on. Keeping proper antenna spacing is the only way to prevent physical tag invisibility.<\/p>\n<h2>UHF RFID Minimum Spacing by Application &amp; Substrate<\/h2>\n<p>When deploying <a href=\"https:\/\/jnrfid.com\/product\/passive-uhf-rfid-tag\/\">passive RFID tags<\/a>, a one-size-fits-all approach to antenna spacing will cause severe read range degradation. Different target substrates and packing densities alter how electromagnetic coupling and signal attenuation affect your system<sup><a href=\"#ref-1\" class=\"cite-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 1: NIST SP 800-98\">[1]<\/a><\/sup>. <\/p>\n<p>Based on lab testing and deployment data, standard <strong>uhf rfid minimum spacing between tags to avoid interference<\/strong> guidelines by substrate look like this:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th style=\"text-align: left;\">Application \/ Substrate<\/th>\n<th style=\"text-align: left;\">Recommended Minimum Spacing<\/th>\n<th style=\"text-align: left;\">Primary RF Risk<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>High-Density Apparel &amp; Retail<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">1.0 to 1.5 inches<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">Mutual coupling &amp; tag detuning<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>Corrugated Cartons &amp; Logistics<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">2.0 to 3.0 inches<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">Overlapping read zones &amp; shadowing<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>Asset Tracking on Metal<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">3.0+ inches (Specialized Tags)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">Parasitic capacitance &amp; detuning effect<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>Vehicle Access (Windshields)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">4.0+ inches<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">Multipath reflection &amp; phase cancellation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>Liquid Containers &amp; Biologics<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">2.5 to 3.5 inches<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">Dielectric RF absorption<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/jnrfid.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/minimum_spacing_between_uhf_rfid_tags_mTo.webp\" alt=\"minimum spacing between uhf rfid tags\"><\/p>\n<h3>High-Density Apparel &amp; Retail (1.0 to 1.5 Inches)<\/h3>\n<p>In stacked denim, hanging garments, or shoeboxes, tight packing leads to a severe <strong>detuning effect<\/strong>. When passive RFID tags are placed closer than 1.0 inch apart, their antennas couple electromagnetically, shifting their resonant frequency outside the standard 860\u2013960 MHz frequency band. To maintain 100% inventory accuracy in retail item-level tagging, maintain a physical gap of at least 1.0 to 1.5 inches between tag faces.<\/p>\n<h3>Corrugated Cartons &amp; Palletized Logistics (2.0 to 3.0 Inches)<\/h3>\n<p>For bulk packaging and palletized shipping, the primary threat is <strong>tag-to-tag collision<\/strong> within overlapping read zones\u2014see also <a href=\"https:\/\/jnrfid.com\/minimum-distance-between-uhf-rfid-tags-to-avoid-interference\/\">minimum distance between UHF RFID tags<\/a> for reader-side separation rules. While the corrugated cardboard itself has a low dielectric constant, tightly bunched tags will shield one another from the RFID reader antenna. Separating inner item tags by 2.0 to 3.0 inches ensures the reader&#8217;s anti-collision algorithm<sup><a href=\"#ref-3\" class=\"cite-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 3: PMC tag-to-tag interference\">[3]<\/a><\/sup> can successfully isolate and acknowledge each unique electronic product code (EPC).<\/p>\n<h3>Asset Tracking on Metal Substrates<\/h3>\n<p>Placing standard labels on metal completely kills the RF signal\u2014use <a href=\"https:\/\/jnrfid.com\/product\/rfid-uhf-metal-tags-ultra-thin-durable-long-read-range\/\">on-metal UHF RFID tags<\/a> with wider spacing. While we design specialized anti-metal tags with built-in foam or ceramic spacers to isolate the antenna, close proximity between multiple anti-metal tags will still distort the localized magnetic field. Keep a minimum spacing of 3.0 inches on metallic surfaces to prevent severe read range reduction.<\/p>\n<h3>Vehicle Access Control<\/h3>\n<p>Windshield tagging requires extra physical separation due to the reflective properties of glass coatings and metallic UV tints. When two vehicles or two windshield tags sit too close together, multipath reflections create null zones. Spacing windshield tags at least 4.0 inches apart counters this reflection and prevents missed reads at automated gate checkpoints.<\/p>\n<h3>Liquid Containers &amp; Biologics<\/h3>\n<p>Water and specialized chemical fluids are heavy RF absorbers, causing immense signal attenuation. When passive tags are placed near liquids, the fluid absorbs the far-field energy required to wake up the IC chip. To guarantee a clean read path, tags on liquid bottles or medical vials must be spaced 2.5 to 3.5 inches apart, preventing adjacent fluid masses from completely blocking the RF signal.<\/p>\n<h2>Tag Spacing Workarounds: Orientation, Power &amp; Near-Field Tags<\/h2>\n<p>When physical limitations prevent you from maintaining the ideal <strong>minimum spacing between uhf rfid tags to avoid interference<\/strong>, you do not have to settle for missed reads or degraded performance. Advanced physical and RF workarounds can bypass these spatial boundaries when ideal gaps are impossible. <\/p>\n<p>By manipulating tag physics and reader configurations, we can maintain high read rates even in ultra-dense deployments.<\/p>\n<h3>Optimizing Tag Orientation Alignment<\/h3>\n<p>Parallel <strong>tag placement<\/strong> maximizes <strong>mutual coupling<\/strong> and antenna detuning. To break this electromagnetic coupling, rotate adjacent tags\u2014<a href=\"https:\/\/jnrfid.com\/installing-uhf-rfid-tags\/\">installing UHF RFID tags<\/a> with consistent orientation reduces null reads in the field. <\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>90-Degree Offsets:<\/strong> Positioning neighboring tags perpendicular to each other drastically reduces their shared magnetic fields.<\/li>\n<li><strong>45-Degree Angular Offsets:<\/strong> If a right-angle turn is not physically possible due to packaging shapes, a 45-degree skew still significantly cuts down on <strong>overlapping read zones<\/strong> and detuning.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/jnrfid.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/UHF_RFID_tag_spacing_to_avoid_interference_wkW.webp\" alt=\"UHF RFID tag spacing to avoid interference\"><\/p>\n<h3>Staggering Physical Heights Across Dense Bins<\/h3>\n<p>When items are stacked closely in bins or shelves, linear alignment is your enemy. Instead of placing tags at the exact same height on every package, stagger their physical placement vertically or horizontally. Staggering the physical heights breaks the direct line of <strong>antenna spacing<\/strong>, preventing the tags from acting as a combined, detuned barrier to the <strong>RFID reader<\/strong> signal.<\/p>\n<h3>Reader Antenna Tuning &amp; Polarization Choices<\/h3>\n<p>Your choice of <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/jnrfid.com\/uhf-rfid-tag-antenna-gain\/\">RFID reader antenna<\/a><\/strong> polarization directly dictates how energy is delivered to closely packed tags.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th style=\"text-align: left;\">Antenna Type<\/th>\n<th style=\"text-align: left;\">Best Use Case<\/th>\n<th style=\"text-align: left;\">Impact on Tag Interference<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>Circular Polarization<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">Misaligned or moving tags<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">Reduces tag-to-tag collision by transmitting waves in a spiral pattern, though it offers slightly less raw range.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>Linear Polarization<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">Fixed, known tag orientations<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\">Delivers concentrated energy along a single plane, but requires precise alignment to avoid over-penetration and massive <strong>read range<\/strong> degradation on adjacent tags.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3>Adjusting RF Power Settings to Shrink Overlapping Read Zones<\/h3>\n<p>More power is not always better. When tags are crowded, high reader transmit power creates massive, bloated read zones that excite too many tags at once, worsening <strong>tag-to-tag collision<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<p>We recommend dialing back the RF power to the lowest effective level. Shrinking the active read zone ensures the reader only interrogates a small, manageable cluster of tags at any given millisecond, allowing the built-in <strong>anti-collision algorithm<\/strong> to work efficiently.<\/p>\n<h3>Choosing Lower-Gain or Specialized Near-Field Tags for High Density<\/h3>\n<p>Standard far-field UHF tags are designed for maximum distance, meaning they readily couple with neighboring tags when placed close together. For high-density applications, specialized <strong>near-field<\/strong> tags or <a href=\"https:\/\/jnrfid.com\/product\/gen-2-uhf-rfid-tags\/\">Gen 2 UHF RFID tags<\/a> with low-gain miniature inlays help. These tags communicate primarily via magnetic induction rather than propagating backscatter waves in the <strong>860\u2013960 MHz frequency band<\/strong><sup><a href=\"#ref-2\" class=\"cite-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 2: ISO\/IEC 18000-63\">[2]<\/a><\/sup>, virtually eliminating mutual coupling and allowing for incredibly tight spacing.<\/p>\n<h2>OEM Inlay Tuning for High-Density Tag Layouts<\/h2>\n<p>When standard off-the-shelf tags fail due to tight physical boundaries, we engineer tailored solutions to keep your tracking accurate. Custom hardware overcomes severe <strong>tag-to-tag collision<\/strong> and heavy <strong>electromagnetic coupling<\/strong> in high-density deployments. <\/p>\n<h3>Custom OEM\/ODM Inlay Tailoring<\/h3>\n<p>We don&#8217;t believe in a one-size-fits-all approach for complex RF environments. When your application drops below the standard <strong>uhf rfid minimum spacing between tags to avoid interference<\/strong>, our engineers step in to redesign the physical core of the tag.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Antenna Loop Tuning:<\/strong> We shift the impedance of the tag antenna to compensate for the predictable <strong>detuning<\/strong> caused by adjacent tags.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Substrate Customization:<\/strong> We alter the inlay backing materials to minimize <strong>signal attenuation<\/strong> and manage the shift between <strong>near-field vs. far-field<\/strong> performance.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Application-Specific Scaling:<\/strong> We shrink the physical footprint of the <strong>passive RFID<\/strong> inlay while optimizing it for the exact <strong>860\u2013960 MHz frequency band<\/strong> used in your region.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Eliminating Field Failures via 100% Pre-Shipment Validation<\/h3>\n<p>A dense tag layout leaves zero room for manufacturing variances. A minor flaw in a standard chip can cause a massive blind spot when tags are packed tightly together on a pallet or retail rack.<\/p>\n<p><p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/jnrfid.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/UHF_RFID_spacing_to_avoid_interference_OMi.webp\" alt=\"UHF RFID spacing to avoid interference\"><\/p>\n<p>We simulate tight <strong>antenna spacing<\/strong> and <strong>overlapping read zones<\/strong> during our QA process. This harsh testing ensures that the <strong>read range<\/strong> holds up to real-world friction and your <strong>RFID reader<\/strong> maintains a clean line of sight to every single asset. We catch potential null zones in our lab so you never face hardware invisibility in the field.<\/p>\n<h2>Minimum Spacing Between UHF RFID Tags: FAQs<\/h2>\n<h3>What is the absolute minimum distance between two UHF RFID tags?<\/h3>\n<p>For passive RFID tags operating in the 860\u2013960 MHz frequency band<sup><a href=\"#ref-2\" class=\"cite-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 2: ISO\/IEC 18000-63\">[2]<\/a><\/sup>, the absolute physical threshold to prevent severe electromagnetic coupling is <strong>0.5 inches (12.7 mm)<\/strong>. However, to guarantee an optimal read range and avoid performance drops in real-world deployments, we recommend a practical <strong>uhf rfid minimum spacing between tags to avoid interference<\/strong> of <strong>1.0 to 3.0 inches<\/strong>, depending entirely on your target substrate and application environment.<\/p>\n<h3>Can software anti-collision algorithms solve physical tag detuning?<\/h3>\n<p>No. A software anti-collision algorithm only manages the communication timing when multiple passive RFID tags talk to an RFID reader at the same time. It cannot fix the physical detuning effect or signal attenuation caused by mutual coupling. If two tags are too close, they physically mask each other, making the hardware invisible to the reader antenna regardless of how advanced the software is.<\/p>\n<h3>How does circular polarization affect tag-to-tag interference?<\/h3>\n<p>Circular polarization helps capture tags at various angles, but it does not eliminate the physical tag-to-tag collision or overlapping read zones caused by tight antenna spacing. While a circular RFID reader antenna reduces orientation sensitivity, managing the actual <strong>uhf rfid tags minimum spacing between tags to avoid interference<\/strong> remains the only definitive way to stop mutual detuning.<\/p>\n<h3>Does the mounting surface material impact the required tag spacing?<\/h3>\n<p>Absolutely. The target substrate plays a massive role in how RF energy behaves:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Metal &amp; Liquids:<\/strong> These surfaces cause high signal attenuation and reflection. They require specialized anti-metal tags and wider physical separation to prevent complete read range degradation.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Corrugated Cardboard &amp; Plastic:<\/strong> These materials are far more RF-friendly, allowing for tighter spacing configurations closer to our baseline recommendations.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div id=\"references\">\n<h2 id=\"references\">References<\/h2>\n<ol class=\"references-list\">\n<li id=\"ref-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/csrc.nist.gov\/pubs\/sp\/800\/98\/final\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">NIST SP 800-98 \u2014 Guidelines for Securing RFID Systems<\/a><\/li>\n<li id=\"ref-2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.iso.org\/standard\/78309.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">ISO\/IEC 18000-63:2021 \u2014 UHF RFID air interface (EPC Gen 2 Type C)<\/a><\/li>\n<li id=\"ref-3\"><a href=\"https:\/\/pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/articles\/PMC5298651\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Tag-to-Tag Interference Suppression Technique Based on Anti-Collision Algorithms (PMC)<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Apprenez l'espacement minimum entre les \u00e9tiquettes RFID UHF pour \u00e9viter les interf\u00e9rences avec des conseils pratiques d'espacement et les meilleures pratiques anti-collision<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":950,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-954","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blogs"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnrfid.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/954","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnrfid.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnrfid.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnrfid.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnrfid.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=954"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/jnrfid.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/954\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":955,"href":"https:\/\/jnrfid.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/954\/revisions\/955"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnrfid.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/950"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnrfid.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=954"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnrfid.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=954"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnrfid.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=954"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}